node_in_brokering() returns nodes membership as a powerhouse, connector, linchpin, or sideliner according to Hamilton et al. (2020).

node_in_brokering(.data, membership)

Arguments

.data

A network object of class stocnet, igraph, tbl_graph, network, or similar. Internally any of these will be coerced to an efficient implementation. For more information on possible coercions, see e.g. manynet::as_stocnet().

membership

A character string naming an existing node attribute in the network, or a categorical vector of the same length as the number of nodes in the network where each element indicates the group membership of the corresponding node. While this may often be a vector created using node_in_*() functions, it can be any character vector that assigns nodes to groups or categories.

Value

A node_member character vector the length of the nodes in the network, of group memberships "A", "B", etc for each node. If the network is labelled, then the assignments will be labelled with the nodes' names.

Cognitive social structures

A cognitive social structure records each node's report of the ties in the whole network, in a by column that names who reported each tie. Counting every report as a tie of its own would count each tie once for every perceiver who reports it. So the functions here first combine the reports into the locally aggregated structure of Krackhardt (1987), with the intersection rule: a tie exists if both of its ends report it, and a message says so. A tie that names no reporter is kept as it is.

A tie-level function still returns one value for each report, so that the result can be added back to the network it was given. Each report takes the value of the tie that it reports. A report of a tie that is not in the aggregated structure takes NA, or FALSE for a mark. tie_is_random() is the exception, and draws among the reports.

To combine the reports in a different way, do this before the function, e.g. with manynet::to_aggregated(over = "by").

Krackhardt, David. 1987. "Cognitive social structures". Social Networks 9(2): 109-134. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(87)90009-8

References

On brokerage activity and exclusivity

Hamilton, Matthew, Jacob Hileman, and Orjan Bodin. 2020. "Evaluating heterogeneous brokerage: New conceptual and methodological approaches and their application to multi-level environmental governance networks" Social Networks 61: 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2019.08.002

Examples

node_in_brokering(ison_networkers, "Discipline")
#> 3 groups
#>   `Lin Freeman` `Doug White` `Ev Rogers` `Richard Alba` `Phipps Arabie`
#> 1 Powerhouse    Connectors   Sideliners  Sideliners     Sideliners     
#> # ... and 27 more values from this nodeset. Use `print_all(...)` to print all values.